No comments needed. Excellent summary of the current housing market.
If the U.S. housing market is not a bubble bursting, it is at least a boom deflating, as new data made clear today.New home sales sank 10.5% last month, the Commerce Department said, the biggest decline since April 1997 and far bigger than economists expected. The seasonally adjusted annualized rate of home sales was the slowest in nearly two years. Sales have fallen in four of the past six months. Meanwhile, the number of unsold homes on the market rose more than 4%, representing a 6.3-month supply, the highest in more than a decade. Unsurprisingly for anyone with a vague knowledge of basic economic principles, rising supply and falling demand means new-home prices are falling. The median price for a new home fell for the fourth straight month to $230,400, nearly 3% lower than a year ago. It was the first time prices have fallen on a year-over-year basis since December 2003.
New-home sales make up less than 14% of the total housing market; pre-owned homes make up the rest, and they rose solidly last month. But new-home sales are typically a leading indicator of housing trends, while used-home sales are lagging. And last month’s strength in used-home sales was likely the aftereffect of January’s temporarily warm weather and lower mortgage rates.
Some observers worry that rising mortgage rates will hurt the housing market; they certainly won’t help. The Federal Reserve is almost certain to raise short-term borrowing costs next week and could raise at least once more by May. That has no direct impact on 30-year mortgage rates, but could possibly make adjustable-rate and more exotic flavors of mortgage more expensive.
But one reason housing is slowing down already, even with borrowing rates still relatively low, is that many houses have simply become unaffordable to many buyers. A strong economy and job market will keep some buyers in the game, but a slowdown in housing is likely to hurt the economy. The only question at this point, it seems, is whether the housing slowdown will be gentle or screeching. Most economists are in the gentle camp, but a few are not. One of those self-described “uber-bears” on housing, Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics, called today’s report “awful, but not yet a convincing collapse.” Comforting.
By MARK GONGLOFF, WSJ.com
Do you know what’s going on in the housing market? Do you want to know the latest interest rates on a 30-year mortgage? Are you interested in the housing market in general? Is so, Real Estate Weekly newsletter is for you.
This newsletter is filled with useful, relevant information. It comes in to my e-mail box every Friday. I always look forward to reading — mostly scanning — it for couple minutes, but occasionally reading an article or two that it refers to. This is good stuff. I recommend it.
You can read the latest newsletter, March 10, 2006 edition here.
ReferenceReal Estate Weekly, MarketWatch eNewsletter- To receive the newsletter, you need to create a free MarketWatch account, sign in, and sign up for the newsletter from your account details (I was not able to find a link to sign up directly.)
SmartMoney is my favorite financial (monthly) magazine. I recently extended my subscription to it for additional four years. It cost me $16 for four years! That’s cheap, no? I do most of my magazine shopping on Ebay now. Can’t beat the prices.
Here is an offer for a Free subscription for SmartMoney (It looks like I’ll be covered untill 2013 ). All you have to do is sign up for a newsletter.
SmartMoney Free Subscription Offer, Lenovo PC Express
Not a good sign. But I knew it was coming. And it’s only going to get worse in the years ahead.
Do you know how to get information about the foreclosures in your area? Is there a website for that purpuse (I’m sure there is). I’d like to get access to that. I think it might be a good way to snap a bargain (not now, but in a year or two).
In January, 103,540 homes were in foreclosure, up 27% from 81,290 in December and 45% above last year. January’s foreclosure total was the highest level since RealtyTrac began releasing monthly reports in May 2005.
January’s 27% increase in foreclosures is consistent with the increasing foreclosure trend seen throughout 2005. In total, nearly 847,000 properties entered foreclosure in 2005, representing 0.7% of total households. This is still below the historical average of approximately 1%, according to RealtyTrac.
In our opinion, the recent sharp increases seen in foreclosures are indicative of the heightened leverage taken on by home buyers through the past several years of robust price appreciation and record-low interest rates. In addition, we expect the proliferation of adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) and interest-only mortgage products tied to the short end of the curve to provide an additional headwind as short-term interest rates continue to increase. For 2006 year-to-date, on average, the one-year ARM is 132 basis points higher than last year.
ReferenceForeclosure Surge Indicates Home Stretch, Barron’s Online, INVESTORS’ SOAPBOX PM (Need subscription to access)
How is the economy doing? How is the defic going to impact US’s finances? Hear it from the experts. There is an interview from the experts on the state of the economy from Fidelity, From The Experts: Outlook For 2006. It’s very good.
Here are some excerpts.
Q:After peaking at $71 last September, oil prices retreated in the fourth quarter. What’s your outlook for the energy sector in 2006?Siegel: We won’t return to the good-old days of $40 a barrel. Given the vast energy needs of developing nations like China and India, we’ll see oil prices in the $50 to $60 range for years to come. On the upside, high energy costs may spark opportunities for firms that specialize in conservation. From an investment perspective, the energy sector will continue to perform well in 2006, though certainly not as well as over the past two years. I would recommend energy-related stocks be part—maybe 10%-20%—of every portfolio.
Q: The S&P 500 finished the year with a 3% gain, nearly six percentage points lower than 2004 performance. Has this late-stage bull market run out of steam?
Siegel: In every bull market, there’s a stretch when investors take a rest. During the huge 1990s bull market, ’94 was flat and ’98 was rocky. During the 1980s bull market, we had to endure the ’87 crash. Today, earnings are sound, values are good and I don’t think interest rates will rise dramatically. All this makes stocks look attractive in 2006.
ReferenceFrom The Experts: Outlook For 2006, Fidelity Newsletter (free)
I’m going to reveal it all. I’m going to reveal the stocks I own in my Interactive Brokers account. Why? Because that’s where I put my investing (not retirement) money. In the next post, I’ll tell you which ETFs I currently hold. I’m also going to tell you, in the next few posts, which stocks I currently like and that are not in my portfolio right now.
My 2006, Quarter I, Stock Holdings
Applebees (APPB) » Restaurant: ($24.5, S&P Rating: 4 stars; Good Value Line rating): Good stock to own in the restaurant business. Every time I go to Applebee’s, it is packed. I like its food, as well as its growth potential.
Cisco Systems (CSCO) » Networking: ($18.8, S&P Rating: 4 stars; Very good Value Line rating): Good, stable company. Good player in the tech industry. Fairly cheap.
Exxon Mobil (XOM) » Energy: ($61.3, S&P Rating: 5 stars, Great Value Line rating): Great company to own in this energy-starved world. The biggest, most diversified.
Fiserv (FISV) » Financial Computer Services: ($45.1, S&P Rating: 5 stars, Great Value Line rating): Great recommendations from S&P & Value Line. Good combination of tech, and financials.
General Electric (GE) » Multi-industry: ($33, S&P Rating: 3 stars, Good Value Line rating): Very good, diversified company. Great long-term potential. Good slow-moving economy player.
Home Depot (HD) » Home Improvement: ($40, S&P Rating: 5 stars, Great Value Line rating): Good company to own. Good growth potential.
Medtronic (MDT) » Health Care: ($57, S&P Rating: 3 stars, Great Value Line rating): Great Value Line rating. Besides that, I need to do a little more research.
Motorola (MOT) » Wireless Handsets: ($22.5, S&P Rating: 5 stars, Great Value Line rating): Good wireless player, diversified. They have cool phones in the pipeline. Gaining market share.
Oracle (ORCL) » Enterprise Services: ($12.4, S&P Rating: 4 stars, Great Value Line rating): Very good presence in the enterprise that’s just going to increase with PeopleSoft and Siebel acqusitions. I don’t like their price appreciation: read, slow appreciation.
Pfizer (PFE) » Drugs: ($26, S&P Rating: 3 stars, Good Value Line rating): Cheap. Good long-term holding. Good upcoming pipeline.
Time Warner (TWX) » Media & Internet Services: ($17.3, S&P Rating: 4 stars, Good Value Line rating): I believe content is the king and will eventually provide the most value. Time Warner is the leader in the industry. Plus, AOL seems to be on the right track with the portal and recent broadband initiatives.
Verizon (VZ) » Telecom: ($32.1, S&P Rating: 3 stars, Decent Value Line rating): I like Verizon’s long-term potential. I think fiber to house will be big. I think that Broadband to laptop will be big, I like their Wireless. It’s a good, value company. However, subscriber loses for landline will increase, holding the stock price a little.
Walmart (WMT) » Retail: ($45.8, S&P Rating: 5 stars, Very good Value Line rating): The gorilla in retail. Good to own in a slow economy, but I’m going to see if it is not too slow. Great ratings.
Yahoo (YHOO) » Internet Services: ($35.1, S&P Rating: 3 stars, Good Value Line rating): I like Yahoo. I like their services, their growth potential. It’s cheap compared to Google.
That’s it. Those are my stocks that I have invested in the last couple of years and will invest in the near future.
I’m a bit worried about the housing market. You probably know that I’m not buying a house at these prices, especially in the NJ area. But I’m worried that the buyers are over stretching themselves, and when the interest rates rise (a little more), many of them will not be able to pay for their mortgage. As a result, the pool of buyers will shorten. As a result, the whole economy might suffer. That’s what I’m worried the most. But like I said, this frenzy cannot continue, and will not continue, forever. Every bubble inflates to the point when it bursts. Hopefully, it will only be by a slow deflation…
There is an interesting article on Economist.com (one of my favorite magazines; recently subscribed to it), about the housing market in US, and in other parts of the world. I have some interesting excerpts from the The Economist article, Miraculous recovery or last gasp?.
If the housing market does turn sour, it would be bad news for the American economy, as it has been for the economy in Britain, where the recent slowdown has been partially attributed to a weak housing market. In both countries, consumers have become dangerously dependent on strong house prices to keep them feeling wealthy enough to spend. Housing markets may be the canaries that signal the fate of the broader economy. And, as any miner will tell you, canaries don稚 live all that long.
ReferenceMiraculous recovery or last gasp? — The Economist
Housing is slowing down. No question about that: inventories are rising and sellers are having harder time selling. It’s becoming a buyer’s market. The following two quotes from WSJ by Justin Lahart give you a very good summary of the current housing market.
The question is no longer whether housing is slowing, but how severe the slowdown is going to be.
Still, a steep price decline is unlikely. Home builders, like sellers in general, will be slow to lower prices, opting instead to hold on to inventory in hopes of an eventual buyer.
Reference* Investors Retreat From Housing Market — FREE from WSJ.com* Cracks in the Foundation by Justin Lahart, WSJ.com (need a paid subscription)
The article, A Rich Harvest of Losses, in the latest issue of BusinessWeek (my favorite mag) — Oct 31st, 2005 — contains a lot of good advice on how to maximize your taxes (or how to pay the least amount of it). I’ll take the most important excerpts.
You can gain money from this advice if you have stocks that lost in value since you bought them.
Find losses and squeeze some tax benefits from them. Short term losses are more valuable than long-term losses. Why? They can be used to offset short-term gains on which the tax rate can run as high as 35%, depending on your income.
But what if there are stocks you don’t want to sell?You can sell a company and buy it back 31 days later. But make sure you wait 31 days or you will be hit with a wash-sale rule, erasing your benefits.
There is another way, also explained in the article. If you still don’t want to sell your stocks, you double up on them.
One way to douple up — purchase a company shares equivalent to the number you want to unload — and sell the older, higher priced shares after 31 days. You take a loss on the older shares, but establish a new position at a lower price.
Another way, swap your losers with similar companies, or buy an ETF that has a lot of stock in the company you own.
This is some good information from BusinessWeek. I could have used this info last year, when I had some gains.
ReferenceA Rich Harves of Losses: BusinessWeek, October 21st, 2005
![]() |
Sure, it is always nice to buy something and have it surge immediately afterwards. Delightfully, this does happen. But aside from being lucky, investment is all about finding value that emerges over time. Markets tend to be overly short-term oriented; so long-term investors can always find something worth buying whenever the market responds to temporary events.
–Dr. Charles Lieberman
in Barron’s Investor’s Soapbox |
Can’t agree with it more. If you’re a short-term investor or you just want to make a guick buck, you might get lucky and come ahead the smartest guy in the world. However, true investors put their money to work for long periods of time (at least 5 years). They invest in something they like and they get good returns. They always win, as opposed to short-term investors — speculators — who win only some of the time.
Sorry. No data so far.